Move jtag_add_statemove decl/body nearer jtag_add_pathmove.
git-svn-id: svn://svn.berlios.de/openocd/trunk@2184 b42882b7-edfa-0310-969c-e2dbd0fdcd60
This commit is contained in:
@@ -507,6 +507,39 @@ extern void jtag_add_tlr(void);
|
||||
*/
|
||||
extern void jtag_add_pathmove(int num_states, const tap_state_t* path);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* jtag_add_statemove() moves from the current state to @a goal_state.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param goal_state The final TAP state.
|
||||
* @return ERROR_OK on success, or an error code on failure.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Moves from the current state to the goal \a state.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This needs to be handled according to the xsvf spec, see the XSTATE
|
||||
* command description. From the XSVF spec, pertaining to XSTATE:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* For special states known as stable states (Test-Logic-Reset,
|
||||
* Run-Test/Idle, Pause-DR, Pause- IR), an XSVF interpreter follows
|
||||
* predefined TAP state paths when the starting state is a stable state
|
||||
* and when the XSTATE specifies a new stable state. See the STATE
|
||||
* command in the [Ref 5] for the TAP state paths between stable
|
||||
* states.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* For non-stable states, XSTATE should specify a state that is only one
|
||||
* TAP state transition distance from the current TAP state to avoid
|
||||
* undefined TAP state paths. A sequence of multiple XSTATE commands can
|
||||
* be issued to transition the TAP through a specific state path.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @note Unless @c tms_bits holds a path that agrees with [Ref 5] in the
|
||||
* above spec, then this code is not fully conformant to the xsvf spec.
|
||||
* This puts a burden on tap_get_tms_path() function from the xsvf spec.
|
||||
* If in doubt, you should confirm that that burden is being met.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Otherwise, @a goal_state must be immediately reachable in one clock
|
||||
* cycle, and does not need to be a stable state.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
extern int jtag_add_statemove(tap_state_t goal_state);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Goes to TAP_IDLE (if we're not already there), cycle
|
||||
* precisely num_cycles in the TAP_IDLE state, after which move
|
||||
@@ -674,39 +707,6 @@ extern void jtag_add_dr_out(jtag_tap_t* tap,
|
||||
tap_state_t end_state);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* jtag_add_statemove() moves from the current state to @a goal_state.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param goal_state The final TAP state.
|
||||
* @return ERROR_OK on success, or an error code on failure.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Moves from the current state to the goal \a state.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This needs to be handled according to the xsvf spec, see the XSTATE
|
||||
* command description. From the XSVF spec, pertaining to XSTATE:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* For special states known as stable states (Test-Logic-Reset,
|
||||
* Run-Test/Idle, Pause-DR, Pause- IR), an XSVF interpreter follows
|
||||
* predefined TAP state paths when the starting state is a stable state
|
||||
* and when the XSTATE specifies a new stable state. See the STATE
|
||||
* command in the [Ref 5] for the TAP state paths between stable
|
||||
* states.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* For non-stable states, XSTATE should specify a state that is only one
|
||||
* TAP state transition distance from the current TAP state to avoid
|
||||
* undefined TAP state paths. A sequence of multiple XSTATE commands can
|
||||
* be issued to transition the TAP through a specific state path.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @note Unless @c tms_bits holds a path that agrees with [Ref 5] in the
|
||||
* above spec, then this code is not fully conformant to the xsvf spec.
|
||||
* This puts a burden on tap_get_tms_path() function from the xsvf spec.
|
||||
* If in doubt, you should confirm that that burden is being met.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Otherwise, @a goal_state must be immediately reachable in one clock
|
||||
* cycle, and does not need to be a stable state.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
extern int jtag_add_statemove(tap_state_t goal_state);
|
||||
|
||||
/// @returns the number of times the scan queue has been flushed
|
||||
int jtag_get_flush_queue_count(void);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user