rtos: use struct member names instead of comments
This is more readable, and as a bonus the compiler will help out if the definition of the struct changes. Change-Id: Ibf660134d9900173f6592407d5cc2203654a4a1b Signed-off-by: Tim Newsome <tim@sifive.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/6659 Tested-by: jenkins Reviewed-by: Tarek BOCHKATI <tarek.bouchkati@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Antonio Borneo
parent
da434d7d59
commit
5148a1324a
@@ -119,11 +119,10 @@ static const struct stack_register_offset nuttx_stack_offsets_cortex_m[] = {
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
static const struct rtos_register_stacking nuttx_stacking_cortex_m = {
|
||||
0x48, /* stack_registers_size */
|
||||
-1, /* stack_growth_direction */
|
||||
17, /* num_output_registers */
|
||||
0, /* stack_alignment */
|
||||
nuttx_stack_offsets_cortex_m /* register_offsets */
|
||||
.stack_registers_size = 0x48,
|
||||
.stack_growth_direction = -1,
|
||||
.num_output_registers = 17,
|
||||
.register_offsets = nuttx_stack_offsets_cortex_m
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static const struct stack_register_offset nuttx_stack_offsets_cortex_m_fpu[] = {
|
||||
@@ -147,11 +146,10 @@ static const struct stack_register_offset nuttx_stack_offsets_cortex_m_fpu[] = {
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static const struct rtos_register_stacking nuttx_stacking_cortex_m_fpu = {
|
||||
0x8c, /* stack_registers_size */
|
||||
-1, /* stack_growth_direction */
|
||||
17, /* num_output_registers */
|
||||
0, /* stack_alignment */
|
||||
nuttx_stack_offsets_cortex_m_fpu /* register_offsets */
|
||||
.stack_registers_size = 0x8c,
|
||||
.stack_growth_direction = -1,
|
||||
.num_output_registers = 17,
|
||||
.register_offsets = nuttx_stack_offsets_cortex_m_fpu
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static int pid_offset = PID;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user