flash/nor: use default_flash_blank_check() instead of dummy

Some flash drivers had a dummy method for erase_check.
Use default_flash_blank_check() instead if possible.

Change-Id: Iddfeff45ce477007328d061fcb5c553d93c3be98
Signed-off-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/4766
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Christopher Head <chead@zaber.com>
This commit is contained in:
Tomas Vanek
2018-11-15 14:50:08 +01:00
parent 42f1cc576a
commit 63fcef493a
3 changed files with 3 additions and 41 deletions

View File

@@ -232,17 +232,6 @@ static uint32_t lpc288x_system_ready(struct flash_bank *bank)
return ERROR_OK;
}
static int lpc288x_erase_check(struct flash_bank *bank)
{
uint32_t status = lpc288x_system_ready(bank); /* probed? halted? */
if (status != ERROR_OK) {
LOG_INFO("Processor not halted/not probed");
return status;
}
return ERROR_OK;
}
static int lpc288x_erase(struct flash_bank *bank, int first, int last)
{
uint32_t status;
@@ -432,7 +421,7 @@ struct flash_driver lpc288x_flash = {
.read = default_flash_read,
.probe = lpc288x_probe,
.auto_probe = lpc288x_probe,
.erase_check = lpc288x_erase_check,
.erase_check = default_flash_blank_check,
.protect_check = lpc288x_protect_check,
.free_driver_priv = default_flash_free_driver_priv,
};