From 933cb875a8fb6243df52208c725b1c6ebc9662e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Newsome Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 15:39:25 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Don't report exact watchpoint to gdb. (#300) We should have a fix for #295 first. Change-Id: Ic72a7a3fa866fbb5aaed22689adfebf9ce913b50 --- src/target/riscv/riscv.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/target/riscv/riscv.c b/src/target/riscv/riscv.c index dceed61fa..0ba2e15ec 100644 --- a/src/target/riscv/riscv.c +++ b/src/target/riscv/riscv.c @@ -724,7 +724,11 @@ int riscv_hit_watchpoint(struct target *target, struct watchpoint **hit_watchpoi if (wp->address == mem_addr) { *hit_watchpoint = wp; LOG_DEBUG("Hit address=%" TARGET_PRIxADDR, wp->address); - return ERROR_OK; + /* return ERROR_OK; */ + LOG_DEBUG("Not reporting the exact watchpoint to gdb, until we have " + "a fix for " + "https://github.com/riscv/riscv-openocd/issues/295."); + return ERROR_FAIL; } wp = wp->next; }