uint64_t->target_addr_t for stack pointers.
This might be incomplete. It's just a quick attempt to reduce some of the difference between riscv-openocd and mainline. Other stack pointers can be updated as I come across them. Change-Id: Id3311b8a1bb0667f309a26d36b67093bfeb8380a Signed-off-by: Tim Newsome <tim@sifive.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/6586 Tested-by: jenkins Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Antonio Borneo
parent
b5a24386e4
commit
e487205410
@@ -108,10 +108,10 @@ struct rtos_register_stacking {
|
||||
* just use stacking->stack_registers_size * stack_growth_direction
|
||||
* to calculate adjustment.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int64_t (*calculate_process_stack)(struct target *target,
|
||||
target_addr_t (*calculate_process_stack)(struct target *target,
|
||||
const uint8_t *stack_data,
|
||||
const struct rtos_register_stacking *stacking,
|
||||
int64_t stack_ptr);
|
||||
target_addr_t stack_ptr);
|
||||
const struct stack_register_offset *register_offsets;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user