Clean up many C99 integer types format specifiers
This eliminates most of the warnings reported when building for arm-none-eabi (newlib). Hsiangkai, there're many similar warnings left in your nds32 files, I didn't have the nerve to clean them all, probably you could pick it up. Change-Id: Id3bbe2ed2e3f1396290e55bea4c45068165a4810 Signed-off-by: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/1674 Tested-by: jenkins Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Spencer Oliver
parent
75b4cbe356
commit
f132fcf636
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static int lpcspifi_set_hw_mode(struct flash_bank *bank)
|
||||
return retval;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("Writing algorithm to working area at 0x%08x",
|
||||
LOG_DEBUG("Writing algorithm to working area at 0x%08" PRIx32,
|
||||
spifi_init_algorithm->address);
|
||||
/* Write algorithm to working area */
|
||||
retval = target_write_buffer(target,
|
||||
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static int lpcspifi_write(struct flash_bank *bank, uint8_t *buffer,
|
||||
LOG_WARNING("Working area size is limited; flash writes may be"\
|
||||
" slow. Increase working area size to at least %zdB"\
|
||||
" to reduce write times.",
|
||||
sizeof(lpcspifi_flash_write_code) + page_size
|
||||
(size_t)(sizeof(lpcspifi_flash_write_code) + page_size)
|
||||
);
|
||||
else if (fifo_size > 0x2000) /* Beyond this point, we start to get diminishing returns */
|
||||
fifo_size = 0x2000;
|
||||
@@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ static int get_lpcspifi_info(struct flash_bank *bank, char *buf, int buf_size)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
snprintf(buf, buf_size, "\nSPIFI flash information:\n"
|
||||
" Device \'%s\' (ID 0x%08x)\n",
|
||||
" Device \'%s\' (ID 0x%08" PRIx32 ")\n",
|
||||
lpcspifi_info->dev->name, lpcspifi_info->dev->device_id);
|
||||
|
||||
return ERROR_OK;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user