Clean up many C99 integer types format specifiers
This eliminates most of the warnings reported when building for arm-none-eabi (newlib). Hsiangkai, there're many similar warnings left in your nds32 files, I didn't have the nerve to clean them all, probably you could pick it up. Change-Id: Id3bbe2ed2e3f1396290e55bea4c45068165a4810 Signed-off-by: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/1674 Tested-by: jenkins Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Spencer Oliver
parent
75b4cbe356
commit
f132fcf636
@@ -598,14 +598,15 @@ static int stm32lx_probe(struct flash_bank *bank)
|
||||
/* This is the first bank */
|
||||
flash_size_in_kb = first_bank_size_in_kb;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
LOG_WARNING("STM32L flash bank base address config is incorrect. 0x%x but should rather be 0x%x or 0x%x",
|
||||
LOG_WARNING("STM32L flash bank base address config is incorrect."
|
||||
" 0x%" PRIx32 " but should rather be 0x%" PRIx32 " or 0x%" PRIx32,
|
||||
bank->base, base_address, second_bank_base);
|
||||
return ERROR_FAIL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
LOG_INFO("STM32L flash has dual banks. Bank (%d) size is %dkb, base address is 0x%x",
|
||||
LOG_INFO("STM32L flash has dual banks. Bank (%d) size is %dkb, base address is 0x%" PRIx32,
|
||||
bank->bank_number, flash_size_in_kb, base_address);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
LOG_INFO("STM32L flash size is %dkb, base address is 0x%x", flash_size_in_kb, base_address);
|
||||
LOG_INFO("STM32L flash size is %dkb, base address is 0x%" PRIx32, flash_size_in_kb, base_address);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* if the user sets the size manually then ignore the probed value
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user