Clean up many C99 integer types format specifiers

This eliminates most of the warnings reported when building for
arm-none-eabi (newlib).

Hsiangkai, there're many similar warnings left in your nds32 files, I
didn't have the nerve to clean them all, probably you could pick it
up.

Change-Id: Id3bbe2ed2e3f1396290e55bea4c45068165a4810
Signed-off-by: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/1674
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Spencer Oliver <spen@spen-soft.co.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Paul Fertser
2013-09-30 13:31:57 +04:00
committed by Spencer Oliver
parent 75b4cbe356
commit f132fcf636
36 changed files with 163 additions and 160 deletions

View File

@@ -598,14 +598,15 @@ static int stm32lx_probe(struct flash_bank *bank)
/* This is the first bank */
flash_size_in_kb = first_bank_size_in_kb;
} else {
LOG_WARNING("STM32L flash bank base address config is incorrect. 0x%x but should rather be 0x%x or 0x%x",
LOG_WARNING("STM32L flash bank base address config is incorrect."
" 0x%" PRIx32 " but should rather be 0x%" PRIx32 " or 0x%" PRIx32,
bank->base, base_address, second_bank_base);
return ERROR_FAIL;
}
LOG_INFO("STM32L flash has dual banks. Bank (%d) size is %dkb, base address is 0x%x",
LOG_INFO("STM32L flash has dual banks. Bank (%d) size is %dkb, base address is 0x%" PRIx32,
bank->bank_number, flash_size_in_kb, base_address);
} else {
LOG_INFO("STM32L flash size is %dkb, base address is 0x%x", flash_size_in_kb, base_address);
LOG_INFO("STM32L flash size is %dkb, base address is 0x%" PRIx32, flash_size_in_kb, base_address);
}
/* if the user sets the size manually then ignore the probed value