Fix usage of timeval_ms()
First, fix the timeval_ms() implementation to not have K&R but ANSI argument semantics by adding a missing void. timeval_ms() returns an int64_t, not uint64_t or long long. Consistently use int64_t for variables and PRI*64 as format string. While at it, change a few related variables to bool for clarity. Note that timeval_ms() may return a negative error code, but not a single caller checks for that. Change-Id: I27cf83e75b3e9a8913f6c43e98a281bea77aac13 Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/3499 Tested-by: jenkins Reviewed-by: Andreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiofson@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Andreas Fritiofson
parent
f4496b25e3
commit
f19ac83152
@@ -751,8 +751,8 @@ int arm920t_soft_reset_halt(struct target *target)
|
||||
if (retval != ERROR_OK)
|
||||
return retval;
|
||||
|
||||
long long then = timeval_ms();
|
||||
int timeout;
|
||||
int64_t then = timeval_ms();
|
||||
bool timeout;
|
||||
while (!(timeout = ((timeval_ms()-then) > 1000))) {
|
||||
if (buf_get_u32(dbg_stat->value, EICE_DBG_STATUS_DBGACK, 1) == 0) {
|
||||
embeddedice_read_reg(dbg_stat);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user