Fix usage of timeval_ms()

First, fix the timeval_ms() implementation to not have K&R but ANSI
argument semantics by adding a missing void.

timeval_ms() returns an int64_t, not uint64_t or long long. Consistently
use int64_t for variables and PRI*64 as format string.

While at it, change a few related variables to bool for clarity.

Note that timeval_ms() may return a negative error code, but not a
single caller checks for that.

Change-Id: I27cf83e75b3e9a8913f6c43e98a281bea77aac13
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/3499
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Andreas Fritiofson <andreas.fritiofson@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
This commit is contained in:
Andreas Färber
2016-05-22 04:34:04 +02:00
committed by Andreas Fritiofson
parent f4496b25e3
commit f19ac83152
26 changed files with 64 additions and 64 deletions
+2 -2
View File
@@ -751,8 +751,8 @@ int arm920t_soft_reset_halt(struct target *target)
if (retval != ERROR_OK)
return retval;
long long then = timeval_ms();
int timeout;
int64_t then = timeval_ms();
bool timeout;
while (!(timeout = ((timeval_ms()-then) > 1000))) {
if (buf_get_u32(dbg_stat->value, EICE_DBG_STATUS_DBGACK, 1) == 0) {
embeddedice_read_reg(dbg_stat);