Parameter "type" of function armv4_5_mmu_translate_va()
is now not used.
Remove the parameter and the "enum" listing its values.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Function armv4_5_mmu_translate_va() now properly signals
errors in the return value.
Remove former error handling by setting variable "type" to
value "-1".
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Function arm920t_write_memory() default return value
should be ERROR_OK.
All cases of local errors are handled immediately and
not further propagated.
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
Commit 0538081246
introduces a compile time warning:
arm920t.c: In function ‘arm920t_write_memory’:
arm920t.c:567: warning: ‘retval’ may be used uninitialized in this function
Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
the handling of caches, should be moved into the breakpoint
specific callbacks rather than being plonked into generic
memory write fn's.
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
jtag_get/set_end_state() is now deprecated.
There were lots of places in the code where the end state was
unintentionally modified.
The big Q is whether there were any places where the intention
was to modify the end state. 0.5 is a long way off, so we'll
get a fair amount of testing.
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
jtag_add_dr/ir_scan() now takes the tap as the first
argument, rather than for each of the fields passed
in.
The code never exercised the path where there was
more than one tap being scanned, who knows if it even
worked.
This simplifies the implementation and reduces clutter
in the calling code.
use jtag_add_ir/dr_plain_scan() for more fancy situations.
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
Keep a handle to the PC in "struct arm", and use it.
This register is used a fair amount, so this is a net
minor code shrink (other than some line length fixes),
but mostly it's to make things more readable.
For XScale, fix a dodgy sequence while stepping. It
was initializing a variable to a non-NULL value, then
updating it to handle the step-over-active-breakpoint
case, and then later testing for non-NULL to see if
it should reverse that step-over-active logic. It
should have done like ARM7/ARM9 does: init to NULL.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
The recent patch to fixbreakpoints and dcache handling added
a bunch of overlong lines (80+ chars) ... shrink them, and do
the same to a few lines which were already overlong.
Also add a few FIXME comments to nudge (a) replacement of some
magic numbers with opcode macros, which will be much better at
showing what's actually going on, and (b) correct return codes.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Breakpoints did not work because the data cache was not flushed
properly.
As a bonus add capability to write to memory marked as read only
by the MMU, which allows software breakpoints in such memory
regions.
For folk who don't know the ARM920 JTAG interface very well, the
two modes of scan chain 15 access to CP15 are confusing.
Make those parts of the ARM920 code less opaque, by:
- Adding comments referencing the relevant parts of the TRM,
catching up to similar updates in the User's Guide.
- Replacing magic numbers in physical access clients with
symbolic equivalents.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Copy of the 926ejs function. I have tested it only using
my rtems application (where virtual address mapping == physical).
Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
Deprecate the "pass an instruction opcode" flavor of cp15
access in favor of the "arm mcr ..." and "arm mrc ..."
commands, which offer fewer ways to break things.
Use the same EBNF syntax in the code as for the user's guide.
Update User's Guide to say where to find those magic values
(which table in the ARM920 TRM).
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Have various ARM cores delegate to arm_arch_state() to display
basic information, instead of duplicating that logic.
This shrinks the code, makes them all report when semihosting
is active, and highlights which data are specific to this core.
(Like ARM720 not having separate instruction and data caches.)
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Rename some (mostly) generic ARM functions:
armv4_5_arch_state() --> arm_arch_state()
armv4_5_get_gdb_reg_list() --> arm_get_gdb_reg_list()
armv4_5_init_arch_info() --> arm_init_arch_info()
Cores using the microcontroller profile may want a different
arch_state() routine though.
(Also fix strange indentation in arm_arch_state: use tabs only!
And update a call to it, removing assignment-in-conditional.)
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Move the ARM opcode macros from <target/armv4_5.h>, and a few
Thumb2 ones from <target/armv7m.h>, to more appropriate homes
in a new <target/arm_opcodes.h> file.
Removed duplicate opcodes from that v7m/Thumb2 set. Protected
a few macro argument references by adding missing parentheses.
Tightening up some of the line lengths turned up a curious artifact:
the macros for the Thumb opcodes are all 32 bits wide, not 16 bits.
There's currently no explanation for why it's done that way...
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Get rid of mrc_opcode() in favor of ARMV4_5_MRC() or, where
arm*20t should have used it, ARMV4_5_MCR() instead.
Basically, *writing* coprocessor registers shouldn't have
used the *read* opcode ... and both should stick to standard
opcode constructors, not rearranging parameter sequence any
more than already needed.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Changes from the flat namespace to heirarchical one. Instead of writing:
#include "time_support.h"
the following form should be used.
#include <helper/time_support.h>
The exception is from .c files in the same directory.
Switch "mrc" and "mcr" commands to be toplevel ARM operations,
as they should initially have been.
Correct the usage message for both commands: it matches ARM
documentation (as one wants!) instead of reordering them to
match the funky mrc() and mcr() method usage (sigh).
For Cortex-A8: restore a line that got accidentally dropped,
so the secure monitor mode shadow registers will show again.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Uses chaining of command_registration structures to eliminate all
target_type register_callback routines. Exports the command_handler
registration arrays for those target types that are used by others.
Start using the arm_reg_current() call. This shrinks and speeds
the affected code. It can also prevent some coredumps coming from
invalid CPSR values ... the ARMV4_5_CORE_REG_MODE() macro returns
bogus registers if e.g. "Secure Monitor" mode isn't supported by
the current CPU.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Have arm_set_cpsr() handle the two core state flags, updating
the CPU state. This eliminates code in various debug_entry()
paths, and marginally improves handling of the J bit.
Catch and comment a few holes in the handling of the J bit on
ARM926ejs cores ... it's unlikely our users will care about
Jazelle mode, but we can at least warn of Impending Doom. If
anyone does use it, these breadcrumbs may help them to find
the right path through the code.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Define arm_reg_current() ... returning handle to a given register,
and encapsulating the current mode's register shadowing. It's got
one current use, for reporting the current register set to GDB.
This will let later patches clean up much ARMV4_5_CORE_REG_MODE()
nastiness, saving a bit of code.
Define and use arm_set_cpsr() ... initially it updates the cached
CPSR and sets up state used by arm_reg_current(), plus any SPSR
handle. (Later: can also set up for T and J bits.)
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Stash a pointer to the CPSR in the "struct arm", to help get rid
of the (common) references to its index in the register cache.
This removes almost all references to CPSR offsets outside of the
toplevel ARM code ... except a pair related to the current ARM11
"simulator" logic (which should be removable soonish).
This is a net minor code shrink of a few hundred bytes of object
code, and also makes the code more readable.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Add a new is_arm_mode() predicate, and use it to replace almost
all calls to current armv4_5_mode_to_number().
Eventually those internal mode numbers should vanish... along
with their siblings in the armv7a.c file.
Remove a handful of superfluous checks ... e.g. the mode number
was just initialized, or (debug entry methods) already validated.
Move one of the macros using internal mode numbers into the only
file which uses that macro. Make the tables manipulated with
those numbers be read-only and, where possible, static so they're
not confused with part of the generic ARM interface.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Add and use arm_mode_name() to map from PSR bits to user
meaningful names. It uses a new table which, later, can
be used to hold other mode-coupled data.
Add definitions for the "Secure Monitor" mode, as seen on
some ARM11 cores (like ARM1176) and on Cortex-A8. The
previous mode name scheme didn't understand that mode.
Remove the old mechanism ... there were two copies, caused
by Cortex-A8 needing to add "Secure Monitor" mode support.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
And move the rest of the vector_catch stuff into the C file;
it's not part of the module interface.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Same deal: "register.h" got needlessly included all over the
place because of being in a few widely included headers.
So take it out of the header files which included it, and put
it in files which use it ... reduce needless interdependencies.
Also, don't need that extra "types.h" inclusion.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
The arm7_9_checksum_memory() and arm7_9_blank_check_memory()
routines are not actually specific to the ARM7 and ARM9 core
generations ... they can work for any core which can run
algorithms using basic ARM (not Thumb) instructions.
Rename them; move the declarations to a more generic site;
likewise move the code (and tidy it a bit in the process).
NOTE: the blank_check() method falsely returned a success
status (0) on one error path, when the algorithm failed.
Fixed this bug.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
No point in having two identical examine methods for the
ARM7TDMI and ARM9TDMI drivers; move, rename, shrink, share.
Add a bit of doxygen; stop needlessly exporting a method.
Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
