rtos: use struct member names instead of comments

This is more readable, and as a bonus the compiler will help out if the
definition of the struct changes.

Change-Id: Ibf660134d9900173f6592407d5cc2203654a4a1b
Signed-off-by: Tim Newsome <tim@sifive.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/6659
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tarek BOCHKATI <tarek.bouchkati@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Tim Newsome
2021-10-11 09:56:39 -07:00
committed by Antonio Borneo
parent da434d7d59
commit 5148a1324a
9 changed files with 82 additions and 90 deletions

View File

@@ -68,17 +68,16 @@ static const struct stack_register_offset rtos_ucos_iii_esi_risc_stack_offsets[]
};
const struct rtos_register_stacking rtos_ucos_iii_cortex_m_stacking = {
0x40, /* stack_registers_size */
-1, /* stack_growth_direction */
ARRAY_SIZE(rtos_ucos_iii_cortex_m_stack_offsets), /* num_output_registers */
rtos_generic_stack_align8, /* stack_alignment */
rtos_ucos_iii_cortex_m_stack_offsets /* register_offsets */
.stack_registers_size = 0x40,
.stack_growth_direction = -1,
.num_output_registers = ARRAY_SIZE(rtos_ucos_iii_cortex_m_stack_offsets),
.calculate_process_stack = rtos_generic_stack_align8,
.register_offsets = rtos_ucos_iii_cortex_m_stack_offsets
};
const struct rtos_register_stacking rtos_ucos_iii_esi_risc_stacking = {
0x4c, /* stack_registers_size */
-1, /* stack_growth_direction */
ARRAY_SIZE(rtos_ucos_iii_esi_risc_stack_offsets), /* num_output_registers */
NULL, /* stack_alignment */
rtos_ucos_iii_esi_risc_stack_offsets /* register_offsets */
.stack_registers_size = 0x4c,
.stack_growth_direction = -1,
.num_output_registers = ARRAY_SIZE(rtos_ucos_iii_esi_risc_stack_offsets),
.register_offsets = rtos_ucos_iii_esi_risc_stack_offsets
};