forked from auracaster/openocd
rtos: use struct member names instead of comments
This is more readable, and as a bonus the compiler will help out if the definition of the struct changes. Change-Id: Ibf660134d9900173f6592407d5cc2203654a4a1b Signed-off-by: Tim Newsome <tim@sifive.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.openocd.org/c/openocd/+/6659 Tested-by: jenkins Reviewed-by: Tarek BOCHKATI <tarek.bouchkati@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Antonio Borneo
parent
da434d7d59
commit
5148a1324a
@@ -68,17 +68,16 @@ static const struct stack_register_offset rtos_ucos_iii_esi_risc_stack_offsets[]
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const struct rtos_register_stacking rtos_ucos_iii_cortex_m_stacking = {
|
||||
0x40, /* stack_registers_size */
|
||||
-1, /* stack_growth_direction */
|
||||
ARRAY_SIZE(rtos_ucos_iii_cortex_m_stack_offsets), /* num_output_registers */
|
||||
rtos_generic_stack_align8, /* stack_alignment */
|
||||
rtos_ucos_iii_cortex_m_stack_offsets /* register_offsets */
|
||||
.stack_registers_size = 0x40,
|
||||
.stack_growth_direction = -1,
|
||||
.num_output_registers = ARRAY_SIZE(rtos_ucos_iii_cortex_m_stack_offsets),
|
||||
.calculate_process_stack = rtos_generic_stack_align8,
|
||||
.register_offsets = rtos_ucos_iii_cortex_m_stack_offsets
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const struct rtos_register_stacking rtos_ucos_iii_esi_risc_stacking = {
|
||||
0x4c, /* stack_registers_size */
|
||||
-1, /* stack_growth_direction */
|
||||
ARRAY_SIZE(rtos_ucos_iii_esi_risc_stack_offsets), /* num_output_registers */
|
||||
NULL, /* stack_alignment */
|
||||
rtos_ucos_iii_esi_risc_stack_offsets /* register_offsets */
|
||||
.stack_registers_size = 0x4c,
|
||||
.stack_growth_direction = -1,
|
||||
.num_output_registers = ARRAY_SIZE(rtos_ucos_iii_esi_risc_stack_offsets),
|
||||
.register_offsets = rtos_ucos_iii_esi_risc_stack_offsets
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user