forked from auracaster/openocd
target/arm920t: remove command 'arm920t cp15i' deprecated in v0.4.0
The command 'arm920t cp15i' was marked as deprecated in release v0.4.0, almost 11 years ago. We can reasonably expect that in these years any user of OpenOCD has already migrated to v0.4.0 or to some newer release, thus has already updated any local/personal script. There is no run-time warning about the deprecation, but it is reported in the help and in the documentation. Drop the command already deprecated in v0.4.0. Change-Id: I755c4283e13e125558fcd73b15fe20498eae95ca Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/6083 Tested-by: jenkins Reviewed-by: Tarek BOCHKATI <tarek.bouchkati@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1511,80 +1511,6 @@ COMMAND_HANDLER(arm920t_handle_cp15_command)
|
||||
return ERROR_OK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
COMMAND_HANDLER(arm920t_handle_cp15i_command)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int retval;
|
||||
struct target *target = get_current_target(CMD_CTX);
|
||||
struct arm920t_common *arm920t = target_to_arm920(target);
|
||||
|
||||
retval = arm920t_verify_pointer(CMD, arm920t);
|
||||
if (retval != ERROR_OK)
|
||||
return retval;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if (target->state != TARGET_HALTED) {
|
||||
command_print(CMD, "target must be stopped for "
|
||||
"\"%s\" command", CMD_NAME);
|
||||
return ERROR_OK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* one argument, read a register.
|
||||
* two arguments, write it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (CMD_ARGC >= 1) {
|
||||
uint32_t opcode;
|
||||
COMMAND_PARSE_NUMBER(u32, CMD_ARGV[0], opcode);
|
||||
|
||||
if (CMD_ARGC == 1) {
|
||||
uint32_t value;
|
||||
retval = arm920t_read_cp15_interpreted(target,
|
||||
opcode, 0x0, &value);
|
||||
if (retval != ERROR_OK) {
|
||||
command_print(CMD,
|
||||
"couldn't execute %8.8" PRIx32,
|
||||
opcode);
|
||||
/* REVISIT why lie? "return retval"? */
|
||||
return ERROR_OK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
command_print(CMD, "%8.8" PRIx32 ": %8.8" PRIx32,
|
||||
opcode, value);
|
||||
} else if (CMD_ARGC == 2) {
|
||||
uint32_t value;
|
||||
COMMAND_PARSE_NUMBER(u32, CMD_ARGV[1], value);
|
||||
retval = arm920t_write_cp15_interpreted(target,
|
||||
opcode, value, 0);
|
||||
if (retval != ERROR_OK) {
|
||||
command_print(CMD,
|
||||
"couldn't execute %8.8" PRIx32,
|
||||
opcode);
|
||||
/* REVISIT why lie? "return retval"? */
|
||||
return ERROR_OK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
command_print(CMD, "%8.8" PRIx32 ": %8.8" PRIx32,
|
||||
opcode, value);
|
||||
} else if (CMD_ARGC == 3) {
|
||||
uint32_t value;
|
||||
COMMAND_PARSE_NUMBER(u32, CMD_ARGV[1], value);
|
||||
uint32_t address;
|
||||
COMMAND_PARSE_NUMBER(u32, CMD_ARGV[2], address);
|
||||
retval = arm920t_write_cp15_interpreted(target,
|
||||
opcode, value, address);
|
||||
if (retval != ERROR_OK) {
|
||||
command_print(CMD,
|
||||
"couldn't execute %8.8" PRIx32, opcode);
|
||||
/* REVISIT why lie? "return retval"? */
|
||||
return ERROR_OK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
command_print(CMD, "%8.8" PRIx32 ": %8.8" PRIx32
|
||||
" %8.8" PRIx32, opcode, value, address);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else
|
||||
return ERROR_COMMAND_SYNTAX_ERROR;
|
||||
|
||||
return ERROR_OK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
COMMAND_HANDLER(arm920t_handle_cache_info_command)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int retval;
|
||||
@@ -1640,15 +1566,6 @@ static const struct command_registration arm920t_exec_command_handlers[] = {
|
||||
.help = "display/modify cp15 register",
|
||||
.usage = "regnum [value]",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
.name = "cp15i",
|
||||
.handler = arm920t_handle_cp15i_command,
|
||||
.mode = COMMAND_EXEC,
|
||||
/* prefer using less error-prone "arm mcr" or "arm mrc" */
|
||||
.help = "display/modify cp15 register using ARM opcode"
|
||||
" (DEPRECATED)",
|
||||
.usage = "instruction [value [address]]",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
.name = "cache_info",
|
||||
.handler = arm920t_handle_cache_info_command,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user