forked from auracaster/openocd
flash: erase_address now has an unlock option
Quite useful to be able to unlock the flash, just like in the flash write_image cmd. Signed-off-by: Øyvind Harboe <oyvind.harboe@zylin.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static int flash_driver_unprotect(struct flash_bank *bank, int first, int last)
|
||||
return flash_driver_protect(bank, 0, first, last);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int flash_unlock_address_range(struct target *target, uint32_t addr, uint32_t length)
|
||||
int flash_unlock_address_range(struct target *target, uint32_t addr, uint32_t length)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* By default, pad to sector boundaries ... the real issue here
|
||||
* is that our (only) caller *permanently* removes protection,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -108,6 +108,9 @@ int flash_register_commands(struct command_context *cmd_ctx);
|
||||
int flash_erase_address_range(struct target *target,
|
||||
bool pad, uint32_t addr, uint32_t length);
|
||||
|
||||
int flash_unlock_address_range(struct target *target, uint32_t addr,
|
||||
uint32_t length);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Writes @a image into the @a target flash. The @a written parameter
|
||||
* will contain the
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -194,32 +194,40 @@ COMMAND_HANDLER(handle_flash_erase_check_command)
|
||||
COMMAND_HANDLER(handle_flash_erase_address_command)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct flash_bank *p;
|
||||
int retval;
|
||||
int retval = ERROR_OK;
|
||||
int address;
|
||||
int length;
|
||||
bool do_pad = false;
|
||||
bool do_unlock = false;
|
||||
struct target *target = get_current_target(CMD_CTX);
|
||||
|
||||
switch (CMD_ARGC) {
|
||||
case 3:
|
||||
while (CMD_ARGC >= 3)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Optionally pad out the address range to block/sector
|
||||
* boundaries. We can't know if there's data in that part
|
||||
* of the flash; only do padding if we're told to.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (strcmp("pad", CMD_ARGV[0]) != 0)
|
||||
if (strcmp("pad", CMD_ARGV[0]) == 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
do_pad = true;
|
||||
} else if (strcmp("unlock", CMD_ARGV[0]) == 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
do_unlock = true;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
{
|
||||
return ERROR_COMMAND_SYNTAX_ERROR;
|
||||
do_pad = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
CMD_ARGC--;
|
||||
CMD_ARGV++;
|
||||
/* FALL THROUGH */
|
||||
case 2:
|
||||
COMMAND_PARSE_NUMBER(int, CMD_ARGV[0], address);
|
||||
COMMAND_PARSE_NUMBER(int, CMD_ARGV[1], length);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (CMD_ARGC != 2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return ERROR_COMMAND_SYNTAX_ERROR;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
COMMAND_PARSE_NUMBER(int, CMD_ARGV[0], address);
|
||||
COMMAND_PARSE_NUMBER(int, CMD_ARGV[1], length);
|
||||
|
||||
if (length <= 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
command_print(CMD_CTX, "Length must be >0");
|
||||
@@ -238,7 +246,15 @@ COMMAND_HANDLER(handle_flash_erase_address_command)
|
||||
struct duration bench;
|
||||
duration_start(&bench);
|
||||
|
||||
retval = flash_erase_address_range(target, do_pad, address, length);
|
||||
if (do_unlock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
retval = flash_unlock_address_range(target, address, length);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (retval == ERROR_OK)
|
||||
{
|
||||
retval = flash_erase_address_range(target, do_pad, address, length);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ((ERROR_OK == retval) && (duration_measure(&bench) == ERROR_OK))
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -709,12 +725,15 @@ static const struct command_registration flash_exec_command_handlers[] = {
|
||||
.name = "erase_address",
|
||||
.handler = handle_flash_erase_address_command,
|
||||
.mode = COMMAND_EXEC,
|
||||
.usage = "['pad'] address length",
|
||||
.usage = "['pad'] ['unlock'] address length",
|
||||
.help = "Erase flash sectors starting at address and "
|
||||
"continuing for length bytes. If 'pad' is specified, "
|
||||
"data outside that range may also be erased: the start "
|
||||
"address may be decreased, and length increased, so "
|
||||
"that all of the first and last sectors are erased.",
|
||||
"that all of the first and last sectors are erased. "
|
||||
"If 'unlock' is specified, then the flash is unprotected "
|
||||
"before erasing.",
|
||||
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
.name = "fillw",
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user