Oswald Buddenhagen 8fb33ddd49 improve write() underrun handling, take 2 ...

we *really* should not paper over underruns, as they require attention.
however, the previous attempt (c2a6b6e) caused an exception to be thrown
(see #130), which was a bit excessive, and was consequently reverted
(438e52e).

so instead we make the handling consistent with what we do in read():
return the verbatim -EPIPE in this case. this can be simply ignored, and
the next write will resume the stream, so this is mostly backwards-
compatible (the failing write will be discarded and would need
repeating, but that will just cause a skip after the interruption,
which does not seem particularly relevant).

as a drive-by, again stop using snd_pcm_recover(), as it still just
obfuscates the snd_pcm_prepare() call it does in the end.

2024-02-05 23:01:30 +01:00

78 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw